NCT01220960

A Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluating How Art Therapy Can Benefit Women Recently Diagnosed With Breast Cancer

Extracted Fields (from Registry)
Protocol IDNCT01220960
Registration Date2010-10-14
Statuscompleted
SponsorDr. Sarkis Meterissian
CountryCanada
Industrynot industry
Blindingunblinded
Center Typesingel-center RCT
Scopenational RCT
First Patient In2010-08-01
Last Patient Out2013-10-01
Publicationn
Gender %FEMALE
Mean Age18 Years -
LLM Classifications (Side-by-Side)
Field GLM
glm-5.1
9941ms / 8680 tok
CLAUDE
claude-sonnet-4-20250514
Thinking: claude-opus-4-20250514
5052ms / 9883 tok
OPENAI
gpt-4o
Thinking: o3
4237ms / 8527 tok
Review
rct_type parallel RCT parallel RCT parallel RCT OK
cancer_status Cancer Cancer Cancer OK
non_cancer_spec N/A N/A N/A OK
setting_patient outpatient outpatient outpatient OK
setting_place other other other OK
feasibility fully powered RCT fully powered RCT fully powered RCT OK
intervention_pharmacologic no no no OK
intervention_chemo_immuno_radio no no no OK
intervention_complementary yes yes yes OK
intervention_device no no no OK
intervention_psychological yes no → no
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: no Requery: no — The intervention is art therapy, which is a creative/expressive therapy rather than a named structured psychological therapy like CBT, ACT, or psychotherapy.
yes yes → yes → yes
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: yes Requery: yes — Art therapy is a recognized structured psychological therapeutic approach that uses creative expression to address emotional and psychological needs. Thinking: yes — Art therapy is a named, structured therapeutic intervention delivered over 8 weeks targeting emotional distress and meaning-making.
yes no → yes → yes
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: no Requery: yes — The trial involves art therapy, which is a structured therapeutic approach. Thinking: yes — Art therapy is a named, structured expressive psychotherapy used as the primary intervention.
OK
intervention_complex no no no OK
intervention_acp no no no OK
intervention_music no no no OK
intervention_screening no no no OK
intervention_palliative no yes → no
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: yes Requery: no — The intervention is art therapy, which is a psychological/supportive intervention tested in cancer patients, not a palliative care service itself, even though the study mentions applicability to palliative outpatients.
no yes → no
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: yes Requery: no — The intervention being tested is art therapy (a complementary therapy), not palliative care consultation or service delivery - palliative care is mentioned only as a potential setting for implementation.
no no → no
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: no Requery: no — The intervention being tested is art therapy, not palliative care itself.
OK
intervention_education no no no OK
intervention_digital no no no OK
intervention_other no no → no
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: no Requery: no — Art therapy is classified as a complementary intervention, which is one of the specified categories that excludes it from being 'other'.
no no → no → no
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: no Requery: no — Art therapy is classified as a complementary therapy, which explicitly fits under the complementary category rather than the residual 'other' category. Thinking: no — Art therapy is a complementary therapy, as explicitly stated in the brief summary which refers to 'investigating complementary alternative therapies'.
no yes → yes → no
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: yes Requery: yes — Art therapy does not fit into any of the specified categories like pharmacologic, device, or others, and is an example of a complementary and expressive form of therapy potentially classified as 'other'. Thinking: no — Art therapy is a complementary/psychological supportive-care intervention, which is one of the listed categories.
OK
outcome_symptom yes yes yes OK
outcome_qol yes yes → no
shaky reasoning
✗ No consensus Initial: yes Requery: no — The study measures outcomes using ESAS, HADS, and FACIT-Sp-12, which are symptom, distress, and spiritual well-being scales rather than validated general Quality of Life instruments like FACT-G or EORTC QLQ-C30.
no no → yes → no
shaky reasoning
✗ No consensus Initial: no Requery: yes — The study uses FACIT-Sp-12 (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale), which is a validated quality of life instrument from the FACIT family of measures. Thinking: no — The study uses HADS (anxiety/depression), ESAS (symptoms), GSES (self-efficacy), and FACIT-Sp-12 (spiritual well-being) but none of the validated QoL instruments listed in the guidance.
yes yes → no → yes
shaky reasoning
✗ No consensus Initial: yes Requery: no — The trial does not mention the use of validated Quality of Life instruments like EORTC QLQ-C30, SF-36, or FACT-G. Thinking: yes — The study measures quality of life using the FACIT-Sp-12, a validated subscale of the FACIT/FACT QoL instruments.
outcome_dignity yes yes yes OK
outcome_cost no no no OK
outcome_other yes yes yes OK
pharmacologic_sub N/A N/A N/A OK
Back to Studies