NCT03336489

Evaluation of the Organization of Continuity of Care for Home Hospice Patients by Four Parisian Health Networks

Extracted Fields (from Registry)
Protocol IDNCT03336489
Registration Date2017-11-08
Statuscompleted
SponsorFondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild
CountryFrance
Industrynot industry
Blindingunblinded
Center Typemulticenter RCT
Scopenational RCT
First Patient In2017-03-29
Last Patient Out2018-11-07
Publicationn
Gender %ALL
Mean Age18 Years -
LLM Classifications (Side-by-Side)
Field OPENAI
gpt-4o
Thinking: o3
3182ms / 8291 tok 		GLM
glm-5.1
11776ms / 8439 tok 		CLAUDE
claude-sonnet-4-20250514
Thinking: claude-opus-4-20250514
5130ms / 9644 tok 		Review
rct_type N/A N/A N/A OK
cancer_status non-cancer Cancer → non-cancer → non-cancer
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: Cancer Requery: non-cancer — The trial targets home hospice patients with terminal illness broadly, including but not limited to cancer, without cancer as the primary criterion. Thinking: non-cancer — Eligibility targets any terminally ill patients needing palliative care, not specifically cancers.
 non-cancer non-cancer → non-cancer
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: non-cancer Requery: non-cancer — The trial focuses on general home hospice and palliative care organization for terminally ill patients (including both neoplasms and neurodegenerative diseases), without specifically targeting a cancer patient population.
 non-cancer non-cancer → cancer → non-cancer
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: non-cancer Requery: cancer — The study explicitly includes patients with neoplasms (cancer) receiving home hospice care with fatal prognosis, making cancer a primary target population. Thinking: non-cancer — Study targets general palliative care for terminally ill patients with various conditions including neoplasms and neurodegenerative diseases, not specifically cancer patients.
 OK
non_cancer_spec N/A N/A N/A OK
setting_patient outpatient outpatient outpatient OK
setting_place home care home care home care OK
feasibility N/A N/A N/A OK
intervention_pharmacologic no no no OK
intervention_chemo_immuno_radio no no no OK
intervention_complementary no no no OK
intervention_device no no no OK
intervention_psychological no no no OK
intervention_complex no no no OK
intervention_acp no no no OK
intervention_music no no no OK
intervention_screening no no no OK
intervention_palliative yes yes → yes
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: yes Requery: yes — The study evaluates different systems of continuity of care involving palliative care specialist consultation, which is an integral aspect of palliative care delivery.
 yes no
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: no
 yes no → yes
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: no Requery: yes — This study compares two different models of palliative care continuity systems (24/7 phone consultation vs. secure website access for medical information), making the palliative care delivery system itself the intervention being evaluated.
 OK
intervention_education no no no OK
intervention_digital no yes → no
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: yes Requery: no — The intervention involves two systems: phone access to specialists and a secure website for medical records. The website is used for information sharing during urgent visits; it is not a core intervention mechanism but supports continuity of care, which does not fundamentally change if replaced with other information sharing methods.
 no no
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: no
 no no → no
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: no Requery: no — This is an observational study comparing two existing care systems where the digital component (secure website for medical information) is part of routine care being evaluated, not the primary intervention being tested.
 OK
intervention_other no no no OK
outcome_symptom no no no OK
outcome_qol no no no OK
outcome_dignity no no no OK
outcome_cost no no no OK
outcome_other yes yes yes OK
pharmacologic_sub N/A N/A N/A OK
Back to Studies