NCT06576089

Optimizing Recruitment to Drive Equitable Research Opportunity in Stroke Rehabilitation in Canada - The ORDER Pilot Study

Extracted Fields (from Registry)
Protocol IDNCT06576089
Registration Date2024-08-28
Statusrecruiting
SponsorMcMaster University
CountryCanada
Industrynot industry
Blindingblinded
Center Typemulticenter RCT
Scopenational RCT
First Patient In2025-06-16
Last Patient Out2027-06-30
Publicationn
Gender %ALL
Mean Age18 Years -
LLM Classifications (Side-by-Side)
Field OPENAI
gpt-4o
Thinking: o3
2616ms / 9877 tok
GLM
glm-5.1
8235ms / 10029 tok
CLAUDE
claude-sonnet-4-20250514
Thinking: claude-opus-4-20250514
5143ms / 11355 tok
Review
rct_type parallel RCT parallel RCT parallel RCT OK
cancer_status non-cancer non-cancer non-cancer OK
non_cancer_spec N/A N/A N/A OK
setting_patient inpatient inpatient → inpatient → inpatient
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: inpatient Requery: inpatient — The eligibility criteria specify hemiparesis requiring inpatient rehabilitation, indicating that the intervention is delivered while the patients are admitted for rehabilitation. Thinking: inpatient — Participants must have hemiparesis requiring inpatient rehabilitation, so the intervention is delivered while they are admitted.
inpatient inpatient → inpatient
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: inpatient Requery: inpatient — The inclusion criteria explicitly require 'Hemiparesis requiring inpatient rehabilitation' and exclude patients who cannot return to living outside of a facility.
inpatient mixed → outpatient → inpatient
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: mixed Requery: outpatient — This is a recruitment methodology study where participants are approached 5 days to 8 weeks after stroke to decide about enrollment in a rehabilitation trial, with coordinators making visits to discuss participation but not providing the actual treatment intervention itself. Thinking: inpatient — Patients must have hemiparesis requiring inpatient rehabilitation and are approached while admitted for stroke rehabilitation.
OK
setting_place hospital hospital hospital OK
feasibility feasibility RCT feasibility RCT feasibility RCT OK
intervention_pharmacologic no no no OK
intervention_chemo_immuno_radio no no no OK
intervention_complementary no no no OK
intervention_device no no → no → no
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: no Requery: no — The trial involves the use of a tablet to display videos and information, but the tablet is not the focus of the intervention; it is simply a tool for facilitating information delivery in recruitment. Thinking: no — Intervention consists of recruitment materials (video, leaflet) and use of a tablet for viewing, not a medical device being evaluated as a therapeutic or diagnostic tool.
no no → no
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: no Requery: no — This study evaluates a recruitment method using informational videos and leaflets to improve equity in clinical trial enrollment, which does not involve any physical medical devices or hardware.
no yes → yes → no
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: yes Requery: yes — The study uses a mobile tablet as a physical device to deliver recruitment materials including videos and leaflets to participants. Thinking: no — The study only uses a consumer tablet to display recruitment videos and materials, not any medical devices or monitoring equipment.
OK
intervention_psychological no no no OK
intervention_complex no no no OK
intervention_acp no no no OK
intervention_music no no no OK
intervention_screening no no no OK
intervention_palliative no no no OK
intervention_education no no → yes → yes
shaky reasoning
✗ No consensus Initial: no Requery: yes — The study focuses on an educational component with women-centred and aphasia-friendly videos and leaflets as a primary intervention to optimize recruitment. Thinking: yes — The ORDER arm’s main intervention is a patient-facing video, leaflet, and guided discussion that educate potential participants about the host trial, making education the primary component.
no no → no
shaky reasoning
✗ No consensus Initial: no Requery: no — The trial evaluates recruitment strategies using videos and leaflets to improve trial enrollment and informed consent, rather than providing primary patient education or training about stroke management.
yes yes → no → no
shaky reasoning
✗ No consensus Initial: yes Requery: no — This study tests different recruitment approaches (traditional vs. women-centred/aphasia-friendly materials) to improve enrollment in clinical trials, which is a methodological intervention rather than an educational program for participants. Thinking: no — This is a recruitment methodology study comparing different ways to present trial information for informed consent, not a patient education intervention.
intervention_digital no no → no → yes
shaky reasoning
✗ No consensus Initial: no Requery: no — The digital component (video and tablet) supplements traditional recruitment methods but is not the primary delivery mechanism of the intervention, which focuses on recruitment methods rather than digital health intervention. Thinking: yes — The core intervention is a tablet-based, aphasia-friendly video used to recruit participants, so digital media is central to delivering the intervention.
yes yes → no
shaky reasoning
✗ No consensus Initial: yes Requery: no — The study compares a tablet-based recruitment video against traditional paper-based consent methods to determine its effect on patient enrollment, meaning the tablet is merely an alternative delivery mechanism for information rather than a fundamental digital intervention.
yes yes → yes → no
shaky reasoning
✗ No consensus Initial: yes Requery: yes — The intervention uses a tablet-delivered video as a core component of the recruitment method, where the digital materials (video and leaflet on tablet) are central to the ORDER intervention arm. Thinking: no — The video on tablet is a communication tool for recruitment materials, but the core intervention is the women-centred, aphasia-friendly approach which could exist without digital technology.
intervention_other yes yes → yes
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: yes Requery: yes — The intervention focuses on optimizing recruitment strategies for diverse participation in stroke trials, which falls under organizational changes, not any of the specified categories.
yes no
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: no
yes no → yes
shaky reasoning
✓ Unanimous Initial: no Requery: yes — This is an organizational/methodological intervention testing different recruitment strategies (women-centred, aphasia-friendly video and leaflet vs traditional materials) rather than a clinical treatment intervention.
OK
outcome_symptom no no no OK
outcome_qol no no no OK
outcome_dignity no no no OK
outcome_cost no no no OK
outcome_other yes yes yes OK
pharmacologic_sub N/A N/A N/A OK
Back to Studies