NCT06847828

✓ Unanimous Initial: N/A

✓ Unanimous Initial: early palliative care Requery: N/A — The study involves a mixed population, focusing on communication tools in end-of-life care without specifying a disease category.

✓ Unanimous Initial: early palliative care Requery: N/A — The study focuses on terminally ill patients in general without specifying a particular non-cancer disease category, and involves mixed populations receiving end-of-life care.

✓ Unanimous Initial: mixed Requery: mixed — The study explicitly includes participants from both inpatient ("hospice wards") and outpatient ("home care") settings within the same medical center.

✓ Unanimous Initial: outpatient Requery: outpatient — The intervention is delivered to homecare workers providing care to terminally ill patients in a home care setting. Thinking: mixed — Caregivers are drawn from hospice wards (inpatient) and from home-care visits (outpatient), so the intervention spans both settings.

✓ Unanimous Initial: outpatient Requery: outpatient — The study involves Indonesian caregivers providing end-of-life care in home settings, where patients receive hospice home care rather than being hospitalized. Thinking: mixed — The study explicitly includes Indonesian caregivers working in both hospice wards (inpatient) and providing home care (outpatient).

✓ Unanimous Initial: hospice

✓ Unanimous Initial: home care Requery: home care — The intervention is delivered in the patient's home, specifically targeting Indonesian homecare workers providing end-of-life care.

✓ Unanimous Initial: home care Requery: home care — The study focuses on Indonesian caregivers providing hospice home care services, with interventions delivered during nurse home visits to patients in their homes.

✓ Unanimous Initial: feasibility RCT

✓ Unanimous Initial: fully powered RCT Requery: feasibility RCT — The primary outcomes focus on communication self-efficacy, caregiving preparedness, and satisfaction, which are indicators of feasibility rather than clinical effectiveness. Thinking: fully powered RCT — Randomized study with clinical outcomes (self-efficacy, preparedness, satisfaction) and planned enrollment of 60, with no mention of pilot or feasibility endpoints.

✓ Unanimous Initial: fully powered RCT Requery: fully powered RCT — This is a randomized controlled trial with 60 participants designed to evaluate clinical effectiveness of a Question Prompt List intervention on primary outcomes including caregiving preparedness, communication self-efficacy, and satisfaction levels. Thinking: fully powered RCT — RCT with n=60 enrollment testing clinical effectiveness outcomes (caregiving preparedness, self-efficacy, satisfaction) without feasibility focus.

✓ Unanimous Initial: yes Requery: no — The intervention being tested is a Question Prompt List (QPL) communication tool, not palliative care itself, even though the study is conducted in a palliative/end-of-life care setting.

✓ Unanimous Initial: no Requery: no — The trial tests the effectiveness of a Question Prompt List (QPL) for communication improvement, not palliative care as an intervention.

✓ Unanimous Initial: yes Requery: no — The intervention is a Question Prompt List (QPL) communication tool to help Indonesian caregivers ask questions during end-of-life care, not palliative care consultation or service delivery itself.